Are Vegans Responsible for More Deaths in the Fields? No Way
Published October 31, 2009 @ 09:08AM PT
The comment threads around here have been home to a lot of arguments over the last year, and a few discussions have a habit of resurfacing from time to time. One of these typically starts with a defender of animal-eating accusing vegans of being responsible for more animals' deaths than animal-eaters because of the animals who die as a result of raising and harvesting crops. The person making the argument assumes that people who eat plant-based diets must be responsible for more deaths in the fields than those who eat animal-based diets full of flesh, dairy, and eggs, failing to acknowledge, of course, the enormous amounts of plant foods that must be raised and fed to the animals people kill to eat -- more than must be raised for direct consumption by vegans. As has been discussed in those comment threads each time, the logic fails. And recently, Animal Visuals gave animal advocates a great new tool to answer this weak but common argument. Continue after the jump to view the powerful graph settling the debate.
Click on "Total," "Slaughter," and "Harvest" for the following respective graphs (emphasis, pointing out what distinguishes the three graphs, is mine):
- Number of Animals Killed to Produce One Million Calories in Eight Food Categories
- Number of Animals Directly Slaughtered to Produce One Million Calories in Eight Food Categories
- Number of Animals Killed in Crop Harvesting to Produce One Million Calories in Eight Food Categories
Even in crop harvesting, eating grains, fruits, and vegetables doesn't come remotely close to requiring as many deaths as eating animals and their secretions. Go here to see not only a larger version of the graph, but also an overview of the research backing it up -- including methods, formulas, discussion, and sources.
---
---
Photo of organic vegetables at top courtesy of Flickr user WordRidden
Related Posts
Author
-
Stephanie Ernst is an independent animal rights advocate, a vegan, a tree-hugging environmentalist, and a freelance editor and writer. She lives in St. Louis with an aging corgi-lab and an adolescent rescued pit bull. In her advocacy, she works to challenge prevailing perceptions of animals, to show the connections between animal exploitation and other injustices, to help people see that animals are more like us than different, and to encourage compassionate, nonviolent living and eating.

Facebook
Twitter
Digg
StumbleUpon
Email

There is no argument here.
These deaths aren't the result of a vegan diet, these deaths are the result of the uncompassionate, profit-driven harvesting innovations of non-vegans.
But let's make a deal anyway:
You stop deliberately torturing, killing and eating animals and we'll no longer have to spend all of our time, money & effort on trying to stop you.
At that point, we'll very gladly redirect our freed-up resources to the uncompassionately designed harvesting systems.
The future of farming already lies in greenhouse enclosures which contain no animals or insects.
We'll be very happy to help bring that future closer to the present.
Posted by Jason Harris on 10/31/2009 @ 11:50AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"The future of farming already lies in greenhouse enclosures which contain no animals or insects."
Whaaaat? How many people actually think this? You need worms for healthy soil, bees and other bugs to pollinate...
Posted by Kristen Ridley on 11/03/2009 @ 12:30PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Thanks Stephanie, just heard this info at World Vegan day festival. Its a shame the politicians are to scared to address it when they debate climate change. They are probably concerned its not macho enough and they'll lose the "defiately ignorant mainstream" vote.
Posted by Samantha Pulsford on 11/01/2009 @ 02:15AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I think what many people also don't consider is that it is possible to lessen the animal deaths resulting solely from crop production. Our current methods of crop production are not meant to be animal friendly, but that can change.
Posted by Jen Ruff on 11/01/2009 @ 05:32AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There are many vegans who cultivate their own gardens where they are not obligated to kill any animals in the harvesting of their homegrown fruits & veggies.
In my mind, though, there is no comparison between the deliberate slaughter of livestock for consumption of their flesh and death in the crop fields.
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 11/01/2009 @ 10:38PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
"To produce fruits, vegetables, and grains, it is not necessary to kill any animals directly. However, there probably are some wild animals killed in the process of planting and harvesting plant-based foods on a large scale. Some possible causes of these deaths are farm machinery such as harvesters, ploughs, or tractors, chemical pesticides, or direct poisoning or trapping of animals who pose a threat to the crops. As Davis puts it,"
"Although accurate estimates of the total number of animals killed by different agronomic practices from plowing to harvesting are not available, some studies show that the numbers are quite large."
The quotes above are from the study, and I am glad that the wildlife killed is mentioned, but the reality is that they really don't keep counts on the wildlife that are killed for crop production. This is what needs work. Trapping and poisoning the wildlife to protect the food for human consumption whether it be livestock or grains needs attention. Millions are killed to protect the crops and the farmers are not held accountable for keeping numbers on what they kill. We can do better.
Lisa is right. The only way to avoid this is to grow your own food or have a community garden. Although less fox, deer, or raptors may be killed than pigs or beef cattle, it's still not okay to take their lives for our food consumption.
Posted by Michele McCowan on 11/02/2009 @ 09:31AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Is it true that Vegans are from Vega ?
Posted by Brian Earley on 11/02/2009 @ 11:55AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
I'm Vegan & I live in Las Vegas. ;)
Posted by Lisa Smolen on 11/02/2009 @ 12:01PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
:-)
Posted by K J on 11/02/2009 @ 01:52PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
VIVA LAS VEGANS!
;)
Posted by Michele McCowan on 11/02/2009 @ 03:04PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
And what about unborn human babies ?
Posted by Brian Earley on 11/06/2009 @ 02:44PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What about them?
Posted by Michele McCowan on 11/06/2009 @ 04:51PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
Are you trying to start a "Pro-Life" conversation?
Not sure what you mean by that.
Seems that UNBORN humans have more rights than animals that are already born, doesn't it?
Think of how much more this world would be over-populated if abortions were not allowed.
It's a good thing. It's about choice. Animals have no choice.
Posted by Michele McCowan on 11/06/2009 @ 04:56PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
There is an inconsistency in the argument.
Is there an over-population problem in the world or an injustice issue ?
How does a positive abortion attitude resolve either ?
Posted by Brian Earley on 11/07/2009 @ 09:22AM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
this is inappropriate on this thread which is about animal rights and has nothing to do with abortion rights. the fact is that vegans cannot be put into a single group of pro lifers or pro choicers. This is a topic best discussed on an article which deals with said topic. In my opinion, this is trolling.
Posted by Heather Spealman on 12/03/2009 @ 12:19PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.
What is a vegan ? Is it a baby or an abstract construct ? Your opinion is not very well informed classically but perhaps empirically, which is the crux of the matter. The mutually exclusives here is that all people are either vegans or non-vegans. My question is elementary to that fact. Are vegans human being or are there non-humans who are vegans. The argument follows logically from there. Using logic we will find that it is inconsistent to be both professing vegan and pro-abortion; the termination of life just as vegans are opposed to taking innocent life. That is the point not trolling or inappropriate how-ever one may feel about the topic.
Posted by Brian Earley on 12/04/2009 @ 04:59PM PT
You must be signed in to report content.